The second season of Amazon's The Rings of Power ignited controversy and online discussions following the portrayal of a sympathetic orc family, a theme that was predominantly overlooked in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.
What Is ‘The Rings Of Power’ Orc Family Controversy?
Unlike the savage and ruthless orcs depicted in Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings, Amazon’s Rings of Power introduces an orc soldier who is reluctant to engage in warfare. This compassionate orc bids farewell to his family, representing the first instance of an orc mother and child in any adaptation of J.R.R.Tolkien’s writings.
The portrayal of a pacifist orc, along with the presence of a nurturing mother and her child, has led some critics to argue that the series deviates from established canon and undermines Tolkien’s meticulously developed mythology.
Does Amazon’s ‘Rings of Power’ Really Break Canon?
Amazon's "Rings of Power" has previously ventured beyond the established canon of Tolkien, yet the exploration of orc morality and familial bonds presents a compelling gray area within his literary universe.
Informed fans of Tolkien have engaged in this discourse for many years, pondering whether orcs possess the capacity for family ties or free will.
In a technical sense, the scene in question does not outright contradict Tolkien’s canon, as he himself expressed uncertainty regarding the true essence of orcs.
Nevertheless, the scene does disrupt the tone set by both the original texts and Peter Jackson’s adaptations of "The Lord of the Rings" and "The Hobbit." While sympathetic portrayals of orcs have become prevalent in contemporary culture, as seen in games like Dungeons & Dragons and World of Warcraft, Tolkien’s orcs are predominantly characterized as monstrous beings devoid of empathy.
The depiction of an innocent orc infant raises questions about the intrinsic malevolence attributed to the orc race—this child is evidently cherished by its mother, and reciprocates that affection.
For numerous viewers, this portrayal felt dissonant; the audience is traditionally not meant to empathize with these beings, who consistently find themselves on the opposing side of Middle-Earth's historical narrative.
Orcs are depicted as joyfully slaughtered both on screen and within the pages of Tolkien’s works, yet the notion of orc families introduces an unsettling nuance to these victorious moments.
Tolkien is widely regarded as a master of world-building, and while this is indeed true, it does not imply that every detail of his universe was meticulously defined—such precision would render it tedious.
Inconsistencies are present throughout Tolkien’s oeuvre, much like in the works of any other author; he often revised his ideas, left certain questions unresolved, and, particularly concerning orcs, never established a definitive origin narrative.